On May 6, 11:59 am, "Myself Mallu, Yourself?"
Post by Myself Mallu, Yourself?Whether or not the term "dalit" is official is completely irrelevant to
this discussion.
Nothing is without a motive. The term dalit is a political term. It is
an attempt to bring together sc. st, bc and mbc thus enlarging the
vote base under the banner of the persecuted! Sc commission did not
fall for that. Christians and Muslims prefer this term so they can
covert and exploit
Bollocks! Dalit is not a "political term." दलित is a pure Sanskrit word
(past particइple of दल्-क्त) meaning (from Apte): "1. Broken, torn, rent,
burst, split; 2. Opened, expanded; 3. Bisected; 4. Driven asunder,
dispelled, scattered; 5. Trodden down, crushed, destroyed; 6.
Manifested, displayed." [There you go! Primary, secondary, and tertiary
meanings of the word. BTW, the word is in Monier-Williams too]. The word
was used by Jotiba Phule (19th century) way before any Hindu caste (or
tribe) went into a constitutional schedule. In some sense the term has
more meaning than any schedule this or that.
Yes, the NCSC (under Buta Singh - father of "Sweetie" Singh) pulled off
the "official designation" bit and asked governments to end its use. I
don't know if UP ever complied when Mayawati was running the show.
Whether Hindu, Muslim, Christian, whatever, the term "dalit" has more
currency than any official mumbo-jumbo term. Hell! Even the mainstream
media use this term.
Anyways, I think you are confusing issues here. Don't worry about the
semantics and officialese, and get to the point. Any evangelical faith,
with its built-in requirement to multiply the flock, will use any means,
fair or foul, to increase the numbers. From the initial "spiritual
succor" angle, larger numbers will mean a push for political power in
the long. This viral spread is very very prevalent in Islam more than in
Christianity. This is well known, and raving and ranting about it here
does not add anything new.
Post by Myself Mallu, Yourself?Buddhists too actively seek converts to their faith. The methods differ
somewhat from the agressive evangelical Christian nutjobs.
Buddhists never exploited any country economically
If there wasn't any political power behind Buddhism, it would never have
spread outside a little part of India.
Compare that to Christians and Muslims whose main purpose is to be the
tool of colonisers
Who are these "colonizers" that you refer to? The days of colonialism
are long over. Instead of using the chance to build a whole new country
and whole new society, India chose the wrong path of bubbling up
centuries old crap, coddling the problem, taking away a sense of
self-worth, ... Gandhi added to this by some condescending terms like
"Harijan" and "Girijan".
Thus syamanthaka maNi ( wrongly called Kohinoor) adorns the head of
the super pirate Queen Elizabeth!
Bollocks! This is the P N Oak version of history. Kohinoor is a 13th
cent. diamond from Andhra (Golconda specifically).
Syamantaka (of the Jambavan legend) is a ruby, not a diamond.
The pirate queen to take "final" possession of the Kohinoor was Queen
Victoria and not Queen Elizabeth (the Queen Mother). It did not adorn
the Queen Mother's head too often, and it sits on display in the Tower
of London.
Post by Myself Mallu, Yourself?That said, it is ironic that alleged "real Hindus" who vent their
spleens here are quite unwilling to kick themselves out of US, Canada,
Europe back to India and help rectify the supposedly "alarming"
situation. Isn't this hypocrisy?
Christians and colonizers use this argument when the are exposed. They
want the victims to leave and go to India.
Bollocks! Raving and ranting here ain't changed a thing, and never will.
But the coolie bastards are sent to US and west by missionaries to
spread hate propaganda!
Huh? Who are a the "coolie bastards"? Are you one? Do you have your own
business or do you work for someone? If you work for someone, wouldn't
that be "coolie" status (regardless of parentage)? If you don't work for
someone, you'd be dealing with "non-Hindus" to welcome Lakshmi Devi
home, wouldn't you? Would that money be "coolie" earnings? I mean to
accept "non-Hindu" money is shameful, no? If don't work at all and leech
off someone, then that would even worse than "coolie," no?
Returning to India is not the only solution
It isn't? How so? You want to be an armchair activist while the "coolie"
sent back home does the fighting there? Or you want someone else to do
the fighting, while you feel superior (and entitled) to a cushy life in
the west as a pretend "non-coolie."
We can do a lot here. Fight coolies here, spread awareness, still
support Hindus in India by various means etc etc
What the hell does that mean? You want to stay in the West to bankroll a
civil war in India, just like Lady Kaka does?
--
VB, Ubetjotushy
'ome=shanty
-----
The Baboon Squad
Dr. Muckeraj, aka Lady Kaka, aka Kakadevi, aka The Old Cow of Hawaii,
and her faithful monkey, Fanabba, aka Poochie, are rabid evangelical
Christians. The Baboon Squad, as Kakadevi and Pooch call themselves,
hates Hindus, Muslims, and Catholics, and the US too, which makes them
copy-paste trash 24/7. The transgender idiot, Kakadevi, claims to be a
"scholar" of Sanskrit, but hasn't demonstrated any knowledge or mastery
of it. However, there is plenty of evidence of attempts made by
Macaulay's monkey to "doctor" original articles to pidginize Sanskrit
words, perhaps to send Sanskrit into the gutter. The "doctorate" that
Kakadevi claims to have is likely for copy-paste research on the myriad
applications of cowdung. Other than some stock phrases that are
copy-pasted regularly, the Cosmic Baboon has shown no originality or
creativity, nor has the monkey contributed anything of value to any
discussion. Macaulay's other monkey, who, apart from saying "ditto" to
Kaka's caca, has no other skills than spraying fire hydrants with raised
hindquarters.